FanHouse

Washington Post: Writers Shouldn't Have Bet in Masters Pool

The Washington Post is shocked -- shocked! -- to find that gambling is going on among its sports writers. That's the topic of the latest column by the paper's ombudsman.

During the Masters, AOL Sports columnist Sean Jensen did some blogging here at FanHouse, including one post in which he described his experience as the "new guy" at a house shared by longtime sports writers including John Feinstein, Len Shapiro and Tom Boswell, who covered the Masters for the Washington Post.

Jensen wrote about a Masters pool in which the writers each put money into the pot and held a "draft" where they picked golfers, with cash prizes for things like picking the leader after the first round and the overall winner. Even though the entry fee was only $50, those writers were breaking the Post's rules:

Emilio Garcia-Ruiz, assistant managing editor for sports, said, "I'm confident that the small-scale pool in no way affected the coverage of the event and was a 25-year tradition that was started only to bolster camaraderie for those living together while covering the event. That said, we've stressed to our folks that prizes for these sorts of pools, including the NCAA tournament, should not involve cash, no matter how small the amount."

I just got off the phone with Jensen, and although he told me, "I can see the point that it raises," he generally feels that it's not a major issue.

I feel the same way. A friendly pool among the writers isn't going to compromise the integrity of the Post's sports coverage, and if that's the biggest issue the Post's ombudsman has to write about this week, the Post must be in awfully good shape.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Fantasy Football
ADVERTISEMENT