
Bethlehem Shoals writes about the NBA without a conscience and sometimes, he can't be contained. When the hour is right, and the news demands it, you'll get more Shoals than usual. One of these hours has arrived, so here's another installment of Longform Shoals.
While last night's Phoenix win was uplifting, I still dread a San Antonio death march into the Finals. Like I said on Friday, Pistons/Spurs in June would be a disappointing end to the season. I'm sure the San Antonio fan reaction would sound a lot like what you get for accusing Bowen of bush league tactics: "haters, you can't deal with our reign, keep your fun to yourselves WE GET RINGS."
Contrary to popular belief, what makes the Spurs so loathsome isn't the success, or the tempo you think we think they play at. Nor is it the lack of thugs, platinum and guns on their roster. Or even the poor fashion sense on display in the above photo.
It's that they're too professional. Ever wonder why the Warriors and Suns sparked such nationwide interest? It's because both of these teams convinced us they were having a blast. On a fundamental level, the Spurs lack the outward intensity that make for a must-see team. Even that frustrated Horry foul, and the near-brawl that followed, were about as rote as those things get. The experience of watching the Spurs appeals only to Spurs fans, who get rewarded with a win.
The problem starts with their franchise player, the Stone Buddha. To the degree that efficiency and resourcefulness can be mind-blowing to people who aren't economists, Duncan's work in the post is amazing. In this post-Jordan area, only the Big Wall of Meat is a more reliable winner, and Shaq's had some pretty impressive help. But even if you love the game of basketball, watching Duncan is a cold, technical exercise, like seeing an accomplished dentist do his thing.
Then there's the military mood Greg Popovich brings to the team. You know how everyone, including announcers, is shocked that the Spurs can run with the Suns-despite having done so many times now? It's because the unsmiling, overcoached Spurs seem totally at odds with everything we associate with the up-tempo game. Even when they score 120, though, their body language says half-court grind.
Manu Ginobili's 2005 postseason was positively electric, but Pop had other plans. That whole spring and summer, we heard how the coach was vexed by Manu's independent decision-making. Since then, he has become less engaging to watch.
In the open court, Tony Parker is every bit as fast as Barbosa, Devin Harris, Iverson, or T.J. Ford. The more he's tailored his game to avoid Pop's wrath, though, the less thrilling it is when he busts out ahead of the pack. That kind of speed should give the viewer goose bumps, not just signal a surefire basket.
Bruce Bowen's being dirty isn't a big deal to me, but his aw-shucks demeanor is. On a pure skill level, Raja Bell is a very similar player: lockdown defender, challenges to top scorers like Kobe, not above getting a little too physical, reliable for the open three. The difference? Raja's a warrior, a fiery player who pours his heart and soul into every possession--and can make critics into fans. Bowen messes with the opposing team with a blank expression on his face, one that only lets up when it's time to complain to the refs.
I know, I know. I'm jealous. I don't get that basketball's about winning and losing. Still, the Shaq/Kobe Lakers were better than Duncan's Spurs have ever been. They crushed everything in their path, spread drama everywhere, and were a thrill to despise. The Spurs may rack up wins and make San Antonio happy, but the Lakers did so while captivating the entire country. The Lakers had haters; outside of their home city, the Spurs inspire nothing but a collective groan.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
5-15-2007 @ 12:18PM
Don Babbitt said...
"Pistons/Spurs in June would be a disappointing end to the season"
You should quit writing about the NBA as it's obvious that you don't like the NBA. And no, I'm not a fan of either team.
http://highfivehoopschool.blogspot.com/2007/05/sports-writers-should-like-sports.html
I hope this helps.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:19PM
Sandy said...
This is kind of like saying, "Heidi Klum is ugly because she's so perfect looking."
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:19PM
PostmanE said...
I was thinking something almost identical to this last night after that Horry foul (probably because Horry is the common component between the Lakers and the Spurs). I really, really don't want the Spurs to win this series ... but like you said, I can't bring myself to really hate them the way I hated the Lakers for their dominance. Death march, indeed.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:26PM
Jon said...
Sometimes some one writes something so pathetic it stands alone...The simplicity of this man's mind causes me great amusement
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:29PM
Jon said...
Sometimes some one writes something so pathetic it stands alone...The simplicity of this man's mind causes me great amusement
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:35PM
Steve said...
Well, he never lets us down. I have ever read anything he has ever written that wsn't completely stupid.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:39PM
Steve said...
I have never read anything he has ever written that wasn't completely stupid. Maybe his Mom should take away his computer ...
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 12:41PM
Steve said...
I have never read anything Shoals has ever written that wasn't completely stupid. Maybe his Mom should take away his computer...
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 1:33PM
Lisa said...
lol, the worst thing about this guy is that he thinks he's God's gift to "intellectual" blogging
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 1:36PM
Lisa said...
lol, the worst thing about this guy is that he thinks he's God's gift to "intellectual" blogging
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 2:03PM
longform's mama said...
Please forgive me I dropped him so much when he was a child.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 2:09PM
crzy said...
3-7: This from 2 guys who can't figure out how to post comments on a blog.
The Spurs are getting progressively harder to watch as the years go by. Death march is frighteningly apt.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 2:21PM
TBAG said...
This article is ridiculous, to say that Shaq and Kobe's Lakers were better than the Spurs ever will be. Do you remember the star studded '04 team that got it's butt beaten by the Pistons from better team play? The same Pistons squad that got beat by the Spurs better team play the next year? Had it not been for the miracle Devon George shot that changed the series, it would have been a Spur three-peat. Not to mention the better Sac Kings team that was better the whole season but folded under game 7 pressure during the '02 conference championship by shooting open looks horribly. The Laker's barely survived that overtime game so don't pretend they "crushed" everything. If Duncan wins the finals this year, he will most likely be the MVP and be 4/4 in the finals to Shaq's 4/6 and Kobe's 3/4. However, Duncan does it without the help of a position player widely considered as "the NBA's best" unlike Kobe or Shaq because Duncan is the NBA's highest impact individual period.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 2:32PM
Steve said...
Maybe if this putz didn't write for a site that crashed when ones' first two comments were entered, and then caught its snap and printed all three at the same time, I wouldn't have to write it three times... but if Suns fans are anywhere near as stupid as Suns players, it probably takes them three times to understand. And even that didn't seem to work in your case.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 2:49PM
Steve said...
The rules don't require a fight, only an altercation:
altercation
A noun
1 affray, altercation, fracas
noisy quarrel
There was certainly an alterction after Horry's foul.
Ther was not an altercation after Elson was undercut.
Amare and Diaw are to be suspended.
Duncan is not.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 3:00PM
Nels said...
I like how at least two people are calling Shoals' stupid but can't figure out why their comments didn't show up, so they post them twice.
It's even better when people change their comment the second time around.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 3:07PM
Steve said...
Well, "Nels", you might try reading post 14 before you display your stupidity to the world.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 3:15PM
brenbren said...
Don Babbitt--
SHIT'S SUBJECTIVE.
And that post you linked to was completely lacking any argumentative logic.
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 5:35PM
Sean said...
It looks like all the grumpy Spurs fans are out in force today. Don't worry, a-holes, Stoudamire and Diaw will be suspended over an altercation your classy team started, thus paving the way for SA to win Game 5. You guys must feel so proud, winning "the Right Way" and all, right?
Reply
5-15-2007 @ 5:36PM
chris said...
Elson was not undercut. He was swinging on the rim and just about landed on a player. It was the most exciting thing a Spurs player did all game. I'm always impressed with the Spurs efficiency and their skill, but I am eternally frustrated by the fact that, yes, they are dirty. Ginobli flops more than a fish in sand and Bowen is constantly slipping under players after they go up. How many ankle injuries have been caused by players landing on Bowen's feet? This past season, the Knicks registered two and made a formal complaint. Duncan is a great offensive player, great defensive player and his undeniable skill makes it even more unfathomable when he whines, flops around and takes dives when he gets frustrated. It is beneath this team. If Amare Stodamire gets penalized one game, there is something wrong. From the replay, you see him, and the entire bench and coaches, heading to Steve Nash - who looked for a second like he'd been knocked unconscious. They were not involved in a brawl, not involved in any fight. If Bowen can knee someone in the groin and Horry can body check someone in the scorers table and not get a game suspension, standing and moving toward your fallen teammate should not garner one either. It's a backwards world with Spurs basketball. I love them and I hate them.
Reply